One of the first
things we are taught in any writing class is to focus on description and
detail. Beginning writers start off very weak with these, then quickly use them
to painful excess. These descriptions and details go from non-existent to
annoying to confusing to many other places, but the important part is that we
learn to use them effectively. We don’t always need to use them, but we need to
develop them as tools so we can bring them out when necessary.
As we progress as
writers, we learn there is no one way to use description. William Faulkner used
the technique of the compounding sentence to create long, elaborate
descriptions – and by long, I mean thirteen-hundred-word sentences –
that are surprisingly engaging. F. Scott Fitzgerald worked his way from
elaborate discussion to the more efficient descriptions, while Ernest Hemingway
went from compact, powerful sentences to more drawn-out discussions of simpler
things.
The reason they all
became famous is because they started with basic description, learned
techniques, then developed styles that quickly became their own, and we are no
different. My earlier writing went through all the stages of development, and
hopefully has further to go, but I learned a few tricks along the way that really
offer variety and depth to any narrative – be it a novel or a simple character
sketch.
My favorite is to
“show” a personality through a narrative that uses visual cues to describe a
personality. This brings the reader into the description because it is not just
an explanation of a character’s looks or their manners, but a switching of the
senses that creates a visual impression while offering a sketch on the person
themselves.
Here’s a description
of a character I will call Matt (this isn’t based on anyone named Matt):
“Everyone knew Matt
from his eyes; they never stayed still. Even when he faced you, drinking,
laughing, joking, those eyes slipped around like vipers, targeting everything
from under the shadowy brim of his low-riding hat. Even during the lonely
moments, two guys drinking cheap whiskey at the back of an empty chop shop, those eyes explored
every angle, every feature, everything but the person before him. Were those
eyes constantly searching for hidden secrets that never existed? I believe they
tried to escape the reality before him. I knew everything about Matt because
every time I looked at him, he never looked back.”
Technically, this is a
discussion of why Matt’s appearance is so memorable, but it offers no visual
cues about Matt’s appearance. The only thing we know about him is that he has
eyes – we know as many details as we know about his hat. The mannerisms,
however, create a story about his character. They set a stage to where we can
select an adjective or two and make him into anything from a paranoid man to a
thug to a scheming monster or maybe a slick con artist. And while the physical
description is minimal, we end the scene knowing the character in our mind.
Conversely, being
strictly visual can convey a deep understanding of how we want that character
to be fleshed out. Visual cues alone are tricky to work with, but active verbs
can complement them to elegant effect:
“I could watch the sun
play in her hair forever, the blond locks lighting up in a radiant glow. The
warmth of the day made her wide smile blossom while her long arms stretched
high into the air as if in joyous worship to the heavens. Her light skin never
burned; the sun would never be so cruel to such a loyal patron. When the breeze
passed she craned her neck forward, leaning into the wind, drinking it in like
a healthy serving of nature’s bliss. She embraced days like these with open
arms, a willingness to drown in the beauty around her.”
While the visuals are
there, the verbs carry a language and tone that provide us with an image of someone
truly content. At this point, we do not need to worry about offering other
details – through the visual, we have created more than just an image.
Our details work best
when they have meaning. Our descriptions carry the most impact when they explain
more than just their target. Using these to their fullest effect does more than
just develop our scene. They develop our writing tools, and get us that much closer
to understanding our writing style.
No comments:
Post a Comment